Some questions

Finally we had the closure of my course that had slowly and steadily reached a point when the only question all concerned cared about was "when will it end?" Couldn't get that buzz that I like to have in the class. Perhaps it was me not being able to give that twist to every tale that keeps people hooked on to the class rather than their cell-phones or perhaps it was them. All in all a very ordinary interaction, will have to spend sometime to reflect on what could be done differently in future. But that is for another day.


Most of the day was spent interviewing graduate applicants. One of the questions asked: so show where does the necking take place. Yes, we engineers can be nosy about such details.

And the final question, what more bizarre turns the story on Peter Roebuck's death will take? I used to like his articles primarily because he wasn't the type to use the cliches that most cricket writers/commentators are guilty of. Through his articles on cricket you could sense his strong opinions. He came across as a man of convictions, one who celebrated cricketing abilities, one who couldn't tolerate injustice, one who sought for extreme punishments for cricketers involved in match-fixing and above all he seemed to be so clear headed, so sure of himself and appeared to care the least what the world thought of him. And yet the picture that is emerging after his death seems to indicate there was a lot that lied beneath.